This is turning into one of those threads where we angrily agree with each other!! EA is good software, but just rubs me up the wrong way when it behaves like you've never run it before post upgrade. I've also seen products with appauling graphics, but they work. Believe me, I've seen products with an interface that a monkey could have built better, installed as a corporate system. Please note, folks: I'm not knocking the thing. I'll merrily shout on those, even though being on the other side of the world it'll take a little longer! Anyhow, Bugs are when the insides don't work right.
I could understand it if the file extensions used matched.Ībout/three license key ones/readme/ordering/help/resources/EA on the web.Īndrew: I'd done that and got a fairly wooly answer from the designer. Never seen anything else mention Macromedia on the way past. Steve: Never seen the MS installer query anything that wasn't MS product. Good practice, as EA build 600 has brought in a very neat improvement when you select something from the toolbox and want to position it somewhere in a large diagram. I habitually upgrade every build of anything from WinAmp to EditPlus, and even when I eventually find out about the M$ Office service packs. I have a fair number of progs installed and in use, and none of them insist on that each time you upgrade.